A coyote in Yosemite National Park, California...

Coyotes. Somehow the famous Warner cartoons and the Disney movies make them seem cute and funny and appealing. When they’re prowling through your back yard at two in the morning, they’re downright toxic. And scary. And looking to make a meal out of any critter they happen to find.

I don’t think I’d care too much if a coyote chowed down on one of the possums that come around, and I’m sure the raccoons could easily kick them some coyote butt (and I know I would not want to hear THAT going on) but the appeal for them in our yard is the small family of feral cats we’ve been taking care of for about a year now. I like those cats. I do not want to think of them being coyote chow.

At least one of the cats thinks the same way, because the other night I heard a scuffle and a yip and by the time I got to the window the mangy coyote was headed out the driveway at top speed. In the morning we found small blood drops on the pavement. I think one of our cats smacked not-so-Wile-E a good one across the chops, and more power to her if that’s what happened, but she’s not always going to be so lucky.

So our goal is to keep those lousy canines from getting into the yard in the first place regardless of how tasty it smells. We’re still not sure how they’re getting in. Probably over the wall between our house and our neighbor’s, which is wood on their side and stone on ours, or over the short chain link gate in the side yard. I did see a coyote slinking down the neighbor’s driveway once, and they have no barrier between driveway and back yard. We have a metal gate on our driveway, but I don’t think they are going over, under, or through it because we would hear it rattle. I didn’t see how the coyote got out of the driveway that night, nor did I hear the gate, so I’m guessing it went over the wall onto our front porch and out that way.  Which means it knew the way and might have come in that way as well. They evolved to be stealthy.

So, after a little internet research, we decided on the least expensive deterrent: Locally Produced Large Male Carnivore Coyote Repellent. Yes, it’s what you think it is: The two resident males peed in a spray bottle and then went out and anointed all the possible coyote entrance routes. We figured this would not bother the cats because they’re familiar with the way our two resident male carnivores smell, and that turned out to be correct.

Then I bought some battery powered LED motion detector lights on closeout at Home Depot. The idea is to affix them to places where they’ll be more or less protected from the elements but still aimed to get into the eyes of marauding canines.  Haven’t done that yet, still debating the best placement. I think probably on the wall of the garage, somewhere on the front porch and perhaps on the side wall of the house.

An article I read recently recommends “coyote hazing,” which means making plenty of noise and waving your hands around and generally giving the coyote the idea that he wants to be somewhere else. (No mention of whether yelling BEEP BEEP would make a difference.) I did try that, but at 2am I didn’t want to go full-out or the neighbors would be reporting me as a nuisance. For the first time in my life I’m considering buying a BB pistol. I don’t want to kill the coyotes (and I don’t want a real gun in the house) but it would be very satisfying indeed to be able to zing one of ‘em on the ass as it trots off up the street.

Since we started spraying the Repellent around, we have not had any more nocturnal prowling, scuffling or yipping. Whether this is because the Repellent work or because the mangy beasts are off eating someone else’s critters, I don’t know. I’m just happy not to be waked up by sinister Canis latrans in the middle of the night.

Related articles

Enhanced by Zemanta
Hope you'll recommend my posts via your favorite social media. Just don't copy the material as your own.

Yesterday, we were in a store where we shop fairly often. In front of us in line was an older gentleman who was talking with the cashier when we walked up.

Out of the blue, he said “And be sure to vote for Romney.” It had nothing to do with the conversation, and nothing to do with the business of the store. And of course even if the cashier disagreed, he could only stand there and offer no opinion.

Not so for the lady behind the older man in line. “Romney, oh yeah, sure,” I said, in a joking tone of voice. And thereby discovered that the man was clearly not accustomed to hearing anyone disagree with his opinion. He spluttered a bit, and then tried to repeat the usual Fox News lies about how Obama’s so bad. Unfortunately, he wasn’t dealing with one of those phantom liberals that Fox and the other media windbags conjure up to display their own superiority. He was dealing with someone who had the facts at her command and was not intimidated by bluster.

His final shot was “Yeah? Well, where’s all that change Obama talked about?

“The Republicans blocked it all.”

“No, they didn’t!”

“Yes, they did. They blocked everything they could.”

“They didn’t! I’m not stupid!”

“I didn’t say you were. But I know what I’m talking about.”

That ended the conversation. He picked up his purchases and marched out.

There are people who are accustomed to making Declarations of their Opinion and not getting any opposition, either because the people they’re talking with agree with them, or the people they’re talking with don’t want to get into it by expressing a different opinion–or they’re in a position where they’re not allowed to offer an opinion. Thus, blowhards become more and more convinced of their own invincible correctness.

It’s astonishing how fast so many of those people wilt when someone who is both verbally fearless and informed on the subject speaks up, which is why I speak up. Someone needs to put a hitch in their gitalong. It doesn’t take much, and it doesn’t take much in the way of confrontational skills. Just have the facts on your side, which makes it easy to stand your ground.

I don’t know why so many people let windbags go on and on and on, when a simple “That’s not true” will go such a long way.  As Davy Crockett either did or didn’t say, “Be sure you’re right. Then go ahead.”

Hope you'll recommend my posts via your favorite social media. Just don't copy the material as your own.
Tower of London, seen from the River Thames, w...

Tower of London, seen from the River Thames, with a view of Traitor’s Gate, created by Viki Male 17/09/03 16:38 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Apparently, one of Mitt Romney’s minions thinks that President Obama doesn’t understand the whole “Anglo-Saxon” thing. I guess he thinks that the WHITE House has gotten a little too, ah, non-Anglo-Saxon for his liking.

Here’s the thing. When the 2008 election was going on, I was doing some research on my mom’s genealogy, and I discovered that we are distantly related to the (now) President through a common English ancestor.  But that’s not all. That common ancestor was a direct descendant of William the Conqueror’s brother (and therefore, so is the President).

So, yeah, that whole Anglo-Saxon thing? The President’s a Norman. And we know what the Normans did to those Anglo-Saxon guys.

Watch out, Mitt and Minions.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Hope you'll recommend my posts via your favorite social media. Just don't copy the material as your own.

I’m a passionate consumer of the printed word. I read hundreds of books every year, almost all of which I get from the public library. I seldom buy books any more, lacking both budget and storage space, but there are a few authors whose works I will buy sight unseen as soon as I can get my hands on them. The most notable of those authors are Diana Gabaldon (fiction) and James D. Tabor (fact).

When I first read Dr. Tabor’s The Jesus Dynasty several years ago I was astounded by the simple rightness of it. I found myself saying “Yes! That’s how it was! That’s how it had to have been!” over and over as I turned the pages. I wrote a review of it here at the time, but in the various transitions and transformations of this blog over time (several new versions of the software, one big database swap, etc etc etc) the review itself got mangled and I can’t link to it now.

When Dr. Tabor teamed up with Dr. Simcha Jacobovici to write The Jesus Family Tomb, and to produce a show about what they then called the “Talpiot Tomb,” I read the book with interest, but could not quite agree with them on their conclusions. I had no religous objections (obviously, since I espouse no recognizable religion) to the idea that the man whose name has come to us as Jesus the Christ was interred with his family in a tomb near Jerusalem, and Dr. Tabor and Dr. Jacobovici laid out their case carefully and with plenty of supporting evidence. But I just could not accept the idea that after all these thousands of years, any particular family’s tomb would still exist, much less the tomb of such an important family.

However, with the publication of The Jesus Discovery, I must say that Dr. Tabor and Dr. Jacobovici have changed my mind. With the new discovery of another, adjacent tomb from the time of Jesus, with clear evidence of its occupants’ belief in the resurrection, it seems clear that the first tomb could indeed have been just as the authors said it was.

I’m just sorry that the book jacket design is so incredibly unfortunate. I think it’s supposed to be a Torah scroll with a silhouette of Jesus overlaid on it. But what it looks like, especially from any distance at all, is a vew of someone’s bare backside. I hope, hope, hope, that new editions will get rid of this cover!

As always happens when new discoveries have been made that have anything to do with Christian origins, there has been the predictable amount of breast-beating, sniping and derogatory commentary. I have never understood why some people are so completely frightened by the notion of new discoveries like this. After all, everything we discover now has been there all along. One would think that anyone who believes the concept of “As it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be,” would have no reason whatever to fear and would welcome the chance for greater knowledge. Alas, this is definitely not the case.

Whether you believe or not, you really owe it to yourself to read this book. Dr. Tabor and Dr. Jacobovici once again lay out their case, point by point, backing everything up with evidence and facts. This is not a matter of accepting the improbable on faith; it’s a matter of following the facts to an inevitable conclusion. I can’t do justice to it in a short discussion because the reader needs to see and understand each step along the way. It’s also worth reading Dr. Tabor’s blog and the Jesus Dynasty Blog (see the link in the right sidebar) to see how he and Dr. Jacobovici answer their critics.

Hope you'll recommend my posts via your favorite social media. Just don't copy the material as your own.

The RainbowRecently, a bunch of terrified religious leaders slapped their names on a “marriage and religious freedom” screed that anyone with two functioning brain cells could see was a horrendous collection of lies. You know, marriage is under attack, religious freedoms are under attack, religious organizations are going to be forced at gunpoint to do all kinds of things they have been taught to believe are totally icky… blah blah blah.

One of the signatories was the Commissioner of the Salvation Army. As it happens, I am a descendant of two of the Salvation Army’s shining stars, and I have their last name. All those other fearful-faithful brethren would not even see a letter I wrote to them expressing my opinion on the subject of Bronze Age superstition clouding 21st century minds beyond all reason… but in that one instance, my name would get me an audience.

I took the opportunity to write. I was polite but firm. Signing that hateful collection of absolute lies was reprehensible. To be honest, I never expected a reply and I was fine with that.

In one of those cosmic connections that defy imagination, I got a reply. It arrived in our mailbox the same day we got the news that our daughter (also a descendant of those two shining stars) and her partner of seven years had gotten married in New York City.

I told the commissioner (among other things) that he was standing square in the footsteps of George Wallace in the schoolhouse door and that my family and I were very sad that his unfortunate lifestyle choices would prevent him from sharing in our happiness.

Marriage equality is inevitable. And the people who frothed at the mouth about it are securing for themselves a place in history right alongside George Wallace, Orval Faubus, Lester Maddox and others who truly believed that they were right.

Creative Commons License photo credit: Kaptain Kobold

Hope you'll recommend my posts via your favorite social media. Just don't copy the material as your own.

CIMG3244Watching the right-wing screamers on the news makes me sad.  Perhaps it’s because I have a good memory and I’ve seen their like before.

People screaming at and spitting on African Americans who dared to enroll in all-white schools.  People screaming at and spitting on “hippies” or “longhairs” who opposed the war in Vietnam (and despite all the mythology to the contrary, it was more likely an antiwar demonstrator who’d be spat upon than a returning soldier).  The people who were active in the civil rights movement and the antiwar movement were advocates for change.  Positive change, in both cases.  The people who wanted the status quo or even a regression to some kind of mythological Golden Age were enraged.

But this kind of fury against progress and change has a long history in the USA.  Many of the people who were early settlers came here so they could maintain their own status quo rather than deal with progress and change in their countries of origin.  There were plenty of people who lived in the American Colonies who wanted no part of those rascally upstarts who wrote that treasonous Declaration of Independence.  The Know-Nothing party had plenty of adherents in the 19th century.  The people who rabidly opposed allowing women to vote spewed plenty of rhetoric across the pages of newspapers, and any internet search will turn up plenty–and the sentiments expressed against giving women the vote are nearly identical to the ones expressed against gay marriage in this century.

And now we have our own generation of militant ignoramuses, who are bound and determined not to allow their children to be anything but militantly ignorant in their turn.

It makes me sad, and it makes me sick.  Yes, the country got past all those other status-quo screamers, and human progress was not stalled forever, but it shouldn’t be that way.

Our children need to know more than we know.  And we can never assert we already know all we need to know.  About anything. There are always facts to be checked and new things to be learned.

At the end of 2007, I wrote a series called “Ten Ways to Take a Stand Against Ignorance.” Little did I know at the time that it would become ever more relevant as the focus on militant ignorance increased. I’m proud of what I wrote then, and I think it’s worth repeating now. Take a look. Tell me what you think.

Creative Commons License photo credit: sinisterbluebox

Hope you'll recommend my posts via your favorite social media. Just don't copy the material as your own.
The Union: blue, yellow, gray; The Confederacy...

Image via Wikipedia

I often frequent forums where political discussions take place (whether that’s the ostensible purpose of the forum or not).  And over the past few years I have noticed something interesting.

It seems that a lot of people espousing the right-wing point of view have a noticeably limited knowledge of American history.  I don’t know whether this is due to lack of education, or an over-reliance on broadcast bloviators, or some other common problem, but as I said, it’s noticeable.

So when someone espousing the right-wing point of view writes a message that demonstrates such a lack, and someone else answers the message politely, with facts that show the shortcomings in the limited, right-wing point of view, more often than not, the original poster responds the same way–instead of dealing with the contents of the reply in their entirety, or even dealing with most of the points that have been raised, the right-winger will seize upon one word, or phrase, and go after that with a chain saw.  Just that one word or phrase, mind you.

I have often thought of reposting the original message with that bogus bone of contention edited out, and when the right-winger ducks the issue again by picking another word or phrase, I’d re-post again with that edited out, and so on and so on and so on till they’ve had to deal with at least one of the real issues.

Alas, that’d take weeks and bore everyone else in the forum to death.

It’s a shame that the right-wing bloviators condition their followers to think that all they have to do is repeat the talking points and everyone around them will agree.  After all, it works that way with the carefully chosen audiences the devotees see or hear.  Pity real-life people who don’t care for right-wing talking points don’t work that way, isn’t it?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Hope you'll recommend my posts via your favorite social media. Just don't copy the material as your own.
09. May 2009 · Write a comment · Categories: commentary · Tags:
Sucrose: ordinary table sugar and probably the...
Image via Wikipedia

Diabetics have a love/hate relationship with food.  For many of us it’s a life/death relationship as well.  Once you get that diagnosis you will never look at food the same way–or you shouldn’t, if you want to live long and prosper.

Those of us who have Type 2 can often, if the diagnosis comes early enough, keep our blood glucose levels under control by carefully choosing what we eat, and by making sure we get some kind of exercise every day, without taking any of the various medications available.  That does, however, mean that one’s dietary restrictions will almost certainly impinge upon one’s social life and other interpersonal connections.

I managed with diet-and-exercise for about four years after the diagnosis.  Unfortunately, for most of that time span I worked for someone whose culture places a very high regard on food and eating, and who could not or would not understand what I needed to do to stay healthy.  I could not “just try” the greasy, sugary stuff that appeared on the office tables during parties.  I could not have regular soft drinks.  And I could not go to the staff Christmas party that was to be held at a restaurant whose set menu for large groups involved large servings of grease and sugar.  (Well, let me amend that–I could certainly have gone to the restaurant, but I couldn’t have eaten anything there, and I didn’t particularly want to contribute $30 to sit and drink coffee while everyone else got to eat.)

It was an unresolvable impediment to my relationship with my boss, and neither of us ever found common ground.  I did my best to explain, but I was left with the impression that she thought I was being stubbornly unreasonable.  Ah well.  Water under the bridge.

It’s been eleven years now since I got the bad news and I’ve progressed through various oral medications and am now on insulin.  That does not bother me.  In fact, it’s so much easier to deal with that I’ve found my dietary choices actually expanding just a bit.  I don’t have to drink vile tasting diet soda any more.  Granted, I can only have one small cup full of regular soda (the kind that’s sweetened with sugar, for reasons I’ll discuss in a moment) but I grew up in an era where a 6-ounce bottle of soda was considered one serving so I’m fine with that.  By the way, should any of you be in the same situation, I can wholeheartedly recommend the book Using Insulin.  It explains everything.

Being on insulin often means weight gain.  Your body isn’t flushing out calories through the kidneys any more and is actually able to use more of what you consume, and guess what happens next.  I have gained a bit of weight and am now making a very concerted effort to reverse that.  As part of the effort I am turning much more of an eagle eye on the content of the foods I consume.

The first thing I did was eliminate to the fullest extent possible anything that contains high fructose corn syrup.  I know there’s no absolute proof that it’s harmful to health, but (despite what a Del Monte representative told me when I complained about the change in the ingredients in their ketchup) it is an unnatural product, and if there’s anything we denizens of the USA in the 21st century ought to get through our heads, it’s that the more we try to fool mother nature the worse off we are.

The second thing I did was to do my best to increase the amount of dietary fiber I consumed each day.  That wasn’t anywhere near as difficult as was getting rid of HFCS.  Besides consuming more fruit, vegetables and whole grains I added fiber supplements, and have seen quite a few benefits already.  My blood sugar is under much better control and I am using noticeably less insulin than I did even a month ago.  And yes, I’m losing weight.  Who knew it could be this simple?

What got me to thinking about this?  I went grocery shopping today.  Since I was a kid I’ve preferred the taste of Miracle Whip over mayonnaise, but of course eliminating HFCS from my diet meant no more genuine Miracle Whip on my sandwiches.  I found that the Ralphs and Vons store-brand analogues did not contain HFCS so I was happy.  Today I picked up a jar at Ralphs and found they’d changed the ingredients.  Growl.  I had also been buying Del Monte ketchup because it did not have HFCS (did have regular corn syrup) but they changed ingredients too.  Now I buy Ralphs store brand “organic” ketchup.  I have had to find different brands of pickle relish, salad dressings (hooray for Newman’s Own!) and other condiments.  Many’s the processed food item I’ve had to talk my husband into putting back on the shelf.  I stopped buying coffee creamer (just as well, it was mostly chemicals anyway–now I use considerably less half-and-half in my coffee).  I now carry my reading glasses in my purse so I can give those ingredients a focused fish eye.

Is all this food-picking quixotic?  I don’t think so.  If more of us refuse to buy chemical glop and choose instead to buy the less-processed, less-chemical foods, the food companies will eventually take notice of what sells and what does not.  So far, it seems that the companies that make store-brand products have not found it unprofitable to use the more natural ingredients that the big agribiz companies have replaced with chemical glop.  I do see that Pepsi and Coke are dallying in the sugar-sweetened-beverage market a bit beyond Passover season, so there’s hope.

As a diabetic I will need to be careful about what I put in my mouth for the rest of my life.  As a consumer, I’d like to think I’d be doing the same no matter what.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Hope you'll recommend my posts via your favorite social media. Just don't copy the material as your own.
Keith Olbermann 3

Image by afagen via Flickr

I watch Keith Olbermann’s show on MSNBC from time to time.  Even though I find myself in agreement with him now and again, I still think he’s a self-important windbag.  I liked him a lot more when he had a mustache and was doing the sports on local TV.

Still, he is rarely in better form than when he goes after that other self-important windbag Bill O’Reilly. And yesterday’s show was a prime example of the genre.

I was still chuckling when my son got home yesterday.  “When one windbag goes after another one,” I began.

“You get a cyclone,” said my son.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Hope you'll recommend my posts via your favorite social media. Just don't copy the material as your own.
Rutherford B. Hayes, former President of the U...

Image via Wikipedia

(Crossposted to journal and LiveJournal)

One of the anti-gay-marriage arguments I’ve seen used more than most is the notion that a child who grows up without a father is doomed to failure.  The people I’ve seen carrying on about it are just absolutely, positively incensed at the idea of lesbian couples raising children “fatherless” or (less often) two gay men raising children “motherless.”

The issue of no father, though, seems to dominate their concerns.  I’ve seen more carrying-on about the idea of fathers being necessary and kids without fathers coming to a bad end than about any other “no parent” issue.

Well, of course fathers are necessary (especially in the biological sense).  They’re good to have around.  If a kid has heterosexual parents it’s a good thing to have one of each gender who form a stable relationship so the kids start life with a sense of security.  If a kid has homosexual parents, it’s a good thing to have two parents who form a stable relationship so the kids start life with a sense of security.  Funny how that works out.

But is growing up fatherless a fast path to jail?  I got to thinking about that this afternoon, so I did a little research.

George Washington’s father died when he was 11.
Thomas Jefferson’s father died when he was 14.
Andrew Jackson’s father died three weeks before he was born.
Andrew Johnson’s father died when he was 3.
Rutherford Hayes’ father died 10 weeks before he was born.
James Garfield’s father died when he was 17 months old.
Grover Cleveland’s father died when he was 16.
Herbert Hoover was orphaned at age 9.
Franklin Roosevelt’s father was an invalid throughout his childhood.
John Kennedy…  well, we all know what kind of father old Joe Kennedy was.
Richard Nixon’s father was abusive.
Gerald Ford’s father was abusive and his parents separated 16 days after he was born.
Ronald Reagan’s father was an abusive alcoholic.
Bill Clinton’s father died 3 months before he was born and his stepfather was an abusive alcoholic.
Barack Obama’s father abandoned his family and his parents were divorced when he was 3.

So that’s 15 out of the 43 men who became president who had absent or abusive fathers.  It may be more than that; that’s just my quick run through easily available sources.  But even at that, it’s 38%.

Somehow I think that ought to be considered, next time people start thrashing around insisting that fatherless children are on a fast track to doom.

Zemanta Pixie
Hope you'll recommend my posts via your favorite social media. Just don't copy the material as your own.